Molière and the New Science: The Connection between the Playwright and the Libertine Philosophers

Main Article Content

Claudia Ruiz García

Abstract

This text on Molière’s work focuses on the possible connections this playwright maintained with the scientific and philosophical circles of his time. His affiliation with skepticism and the group of erudite libertines is of interest, in particular his affiliation with Pierre Gassendi, an astronomer, a great connoisseur of eclipses, and a figure close to the circle of advocates of Galileo. In several plays, this playwright and supporter of the group of advanced thinkers within the famous “Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes” confronts these antagonistic positions masterfully. Within his repertoire, there is a great variety of pieces that build intrigue from a chaotic confrontation of pragmatic characters, and dogmatic positions. Two pieces from the last stage of his production are analyzed here: Le malade imaginaire and Les femmes savantes. These plays allow the playwright to make a fierce caricature of the detractors of the new science. The doctors and sages in each, wise or pedantic, are fiercely caricatured. This creates a very negative image of the supporters of scholastic teaching and extreme respect for tradition and old science.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ruiz García, C. (2024). Molière and the New Science: The Connection between the Playwright and the Libertine Philosophers. A Escena Revista De Artes Escénicas Y Performatividades, (1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.22201/ffyl.aescena.2023.1.2047
Section
Artículos de investigación

References

ADAM, Antoine. (1986). Les Libertins au XVIIe siècle. Buchet-Chastel.

BARBIER, Christophe. (2021). Le monde selon Molière. Éditions Tallandier.

DANDREY, Patrick. (1993). Le “cas” Argan. Molière et la maladie imaginaire. Klincksieck.

DONNÉ, Boris. (2022). Molière. Les Éditions du Cerf.

FERNÁNDEZ, Ramón. (1979). Molière ou l’essence du génie comique. Grasset & Frasquelle.

FORESTIER, Georges. (2018). Molière. Gallimard.

GUILLOT, Hubert. (1968). La Querelle des Anciens et des Modernes en France: De la Défense et illustration de la langue française aux Parallèles des anciens et des Modernes. Slatkine Reprints.

MALLET, Francine. (1986). Molière. Grasset & Fasquelle.

MOLIÈRE. (1965). La Critique de l’Ecole des femmes. En Georges Mongrédien (Ed.), Œuvres Complètes, Tomo II (pp. 103-137). Garnier-Flammarion.

MOLIÈRE. (1979a). Le malade imaginaire. En Georges Mongrédien (Ed.), Œuvres complètes, Tomo IV (pp. 375-460). Garnier-Flammarion.

MOLIÈRE. (1979b). Les femmes savantes. En Georges Mongrédien (Ed.), Œuvres complètes, Tomo IV (pp. 291-373). Garnier-Flammarion.

MONTAIGNE, Michel de. (1962). “Du pédantisme”. En Pierre Michel (Ed.), Essais I (pp. 205-218). Gallimard.

ONFRAY, Michel. (2008). Contre-histoire de la philosophie. Les libertins baroques, Tomo 3. Grasset & Frasquelle.

POISSON, Georges. (2014). Tel était Molière. Actes Sud-Papiers.