The Ontological Character of Fictional Narrative: An Approximation from Martin Heidegger and Paul Ricœur

Main Article Content

Elvia Joana Jacob Buenaventura

Abstract

This paper is located in an interdisciplinary horizon between literature and philosophy and it seeks to justify that narrative fiction has an ontological status by which it is possible to ask and “to answer” the question about the sense of Being because, by thinking of the narrative fiction from Ontology, this one constitutes a model of rationality to face some of the most important philosophical problematics in the Western philosophical thought. The approach is that the “triple mimesis” model, developed by Paul Ricœur in one of his most important philosophical works, Time and Narrative, constitutes the axis on which the ontological character is based due to the prefigure, configure and refigure human actions. This means that the narrative fiction is always a seek for saying to Being and, in this way, for saying to all of ourselves too. Nevertheless, there is in Martin Hedegger’s reflections about language, art and poetry a first ontological anchorage to the extent that Heidegger knows about the revelation of the truth of the Being in these three categories. This fact is also observed by Ricœur and he extends these heideggerian proposals to narrative fiction. The ontological character provides to fictional narrative new perspectives from which it is possible to open unprecedented discussions about the tie between literature and philosophy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jacob Buenaventura, E. J. (2024). The Ontological Character of Fictional Narrative: An Approximation from Martin Heidegger and Paul Ricœur . Nuevas Poligrafías. Revista De Teoría Literaria Y Literatura Comparada, (9), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.22201/ffyl.29544076.2024.9.2058
Section
Otras Poligrafías

References

ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. (1994). Tomás Calvo Martínez (Introd., Trad., y Not.). Gredos.

ARISTÓTELES, Poética. (2000). Juan David García Bacca (Introd., Vers., y Not.). UNAM.

CASAR, Eduardo. (2011). Para qué sirve Paul Ricœur en crítica y creación literarias. Universidad Iberoamericana.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. (2006 [1960]). “La verdad de la obra de arte”. María Antonia González Valerio (Trad.). En Paulina Rivero Weber (Coord). Cuestiones hermenéuticas: de Nietzsche a Gadamer (pp. 165-184). UNAM / Ítaca.

GONZÁLEZ VALERIO, María Antonia. (2006). “La verdad de la obra de arte según Hans-Georg Gadamer”. En Paulina Rivero Weber (Coord). Cuestiones hermenéuticas: de Nietzsche a Gadamer (pp. 151-164). UNAM / Ítaca.

GONZÁLEZ VALERIO, María Antonia. (2010). Un tratado de ficción. Ontología de la mimesis. Herder.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. (1980a [1935]). “El origen de la obra de arte”. (Samuel Ramos, Trad.). En Arte y poesía (pp. 35-123). Fondo de Cultura Económica.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. (1980b [1936]). “Hölderlin y la esencia de la poesía”. En Samuel Ramos (Trad.). Arte y poesía (pp. 125-148). Fondo de Cultura Económica.

HEIDEGGER, Martin. (1986 [1927]). Ser y tiempo. José Gaos (Trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.

PLATÓN. (1988). Diálogos IV República (pp. 457-497). Conrado Eggers Lan (Introd., Trad., y Not.). Gredos.

PIMENTEL, Luz Aurora. (1998). El relato en perspectiva. Estudio de teoría narrativa. Siglo XXI / UNAM.

RAMOS, SAMUEL. (1980). “Prólogo”. En Martin Heidegger, Arte y Poesía (pp. 7-34). Fondo de Cultura Económica.

RICŒUR, Paul. (1995a [1985]). Tiempo y narración I. Configuración del tiempo en el relato histórico. Agustín Neira (Trad.). Siglo XXI.

RICŒUR, Paul. (1995b [1984]). Tiempo y narración II. Configuración del tiempo en el relato de ficción. Agustín Neira (Trad.). Siglo XXI.

VATTIMO, Gianni. (2002). Introducción a Heidegger. Alfredo Báez (Trad.). Gedisa.