Extending the Concept of Technological Appropriation through Historical Materialism

Main Article Content

Leonardo Aranda Brito

Abstract

This article focuses on analyzing the concepts of appropriation and appropriation of fixed capital in Hegel and Marx, respectively, to propose an expansion and redefinition of the concept of technological appropriation, politically oriented towards the construction of a post-capitalist society. The text proposes three readings of the concept of appropriation in Marx: first, as historical modes of appropriation. Second, as a mode of capitalist appropriation. Third, as appropriation of fixed capital. The main argument of this work proposes that the last of these forms of appropriation is a synthesis that originates in the contradictions of the capitalist appropriation mode, and from which a resignification of the concept of technological appropriation can be derived. The article affirms that technological appropriation, far from being limited to the transfer of ownership of technology from hegemonic centers, or being a form of adoption and adaptation of technology to peripheral contexts, carried out by subaltern subjects, can be understood as a political strategy aimed at building a post-capitalist society, based on the reorientation of the objectives of technology, as well as on the rethinking of its organizational forms and its aesthetic, ethical and political dimensions. The last section of this text concludes by proposing the principles to rethink technological appropriation from the Marxist reading that is carried out here.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aranda Brito, L. (2023). Extending the Concept of Technological Appropriation through Historical Materialism . Theoría. Revista Del Colegio De Filosofía, (45), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.22201/ffyl.29544270e.2023.45.1815
Section
Research Articles

References

CARROLL, Jennie. (2004). “Completing design in use: Closing the Appropriation cycle. 12th European Conference on Information Systems” [Ponencia]. European Conference on Information Systems 2004, Turku, Finland. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2004/44.

DELANEY, Patrick; TIMBRELL, Greg; CHAN, Taizan. (2008). “A Marxian Model of Technology Appropriation”. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 8(28). https://aisel.aisnet.org/sprouts_all/233/.

EGLASH, Ron. (2004). “Appropriating Technology: an introduction”. En Ron Eglash, Jennifer L. Croissant, Giovanna Di Chiro, & Rayvon Fouché (Eds.), Appropriating Technology: Vernacular Science and Social Power (pp. vii-xx). The University of Minessota Press.

ENGELS, Friedrich. (2017). El origen de la familia, la propiedad privada y el estado. Editorial Progreso.

EUBANKS, Virginia. (2004). “Cyberfeminism Meets NAFTAzteca: Recoding the Technotext”. En Ron Eglash, Jennifer L. Croissant, Giovanna Di Chiro, Rayvon Fouché (Eds.), Appropriating technology: Vernacular Science and Social Power (pp. 151-162). University of Minnessota Press.

GARCÍA CANCLINI, Nestor. (1989). ¿Modernismo sin modernización? Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 51(3), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.2307/3540751.

GARCÍA CANCLINI, Nestor. (2005). Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. University of Minnesota Press.

HARVEY, David. (2019). Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason. Oxford University Press.

HEGEL, Guillermo Federico. (1968). Filosofía del Derecho. Editorial Claridad.

HEGEL,Georg Willhelm Friedrich. (2022). Filosofía del derecho. Semestre de invierno de 1819-1820. Akal.

LEFEBVRE, Henri. (2020). Hegel, Marx, Nietzche: Or the Realm of Shadows. Verso.

MACKAY, Hughie; GILLESPIE, Gareth (1992). “Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation”. Social Studies of Science, 22(4), 685-716. https://www.jstor.org/stable/285460.

MARX, Karl. (1975). El capital (Tomo 1 / Vol. 2). Siglo XXI editores.

MARX, Karl. (1982). Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economía política (Grundrisse) 1857~1858 (Vol. 1). Siglo XXI editores.

MARX, Karl. (1983). Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economia política (Grundrisse) 1857~1858 (Vol. 2). Siglo XXI editores.

MARX, Karl. (1988). Apuntes etnologicos de Marx. Siglo XXI.

MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich (1991). Marx & Engels Collected Works (Vol. 33). UK: Lawrence & Wishart

MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich (1994). Marx & Engels Collected Works (Vol. 34). UK: Lawrence & Wishart

MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. (2004). El manifiesto comunista. Fundación Federico Engels.

NEGRI, Antonio. (1984). Marx beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. Bergin & Garvey.

NEGRI, Antonio. (2019). “The Appropriation of Fixed Capital: A Metaphor?” En David Chandler; Christian Fuchs (Eds.), Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour, and Politics in the Age of Big Data (pp. 205-214). University of Westminster Press.

NELSON, Alondra;TU, Thuy Linh N.; BALD, Vivek. (2001). “Appropriating Technology”. En Technicolor: Race, Technology, and Everyday Life (pp. 88-99). New York University Press.

NEÜMAN, María Isabel. (2008a). “Construcción de la categoría ‘Apropiación Social’”. Quórum Académico, 5(2), 67-98. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4537486.

NEÜMAN, María Isabel. (2008b). “La apropiación tecnológica como práctica de resistencia y negociación en la globalización” [Ponencia] Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de investigadores de la Comunicación, Zulia, Venezuela. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296669418_La_apropiacion_tecnologica_como_practica_de_resistencia_y_negociacion_en_la_globalizacion.

OVERDIJK, Maarten; VAN DIGGELEN, Wouter. (2008). “Appropriation of a shared workspace: Organizing principles and their application”. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 165-192. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11412-008-9038-4.

POOLE, Marshall Scott; DESANCTIS, Gerardine. (1989, enero 3-6). “Use of group decision support systems as an appropriation process”. [Ponencia] 22th Annual Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences, Kailua-Kona, Hawai'i, Estados Unidos. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.48152.

SUBERCASEAUX, Bernardo. (1988). “La apropiación cultural en el pensamiento y la cultura de América Latina”. Estudios Públicos, 30, 125-135. https://estudiospublicos.cl/index.php/cep/article/view/1589.